like, i’m just trying to post random content. normally i post stuff to /c/[email protected] but this topic feels more mature, less silly.

/c/[email protected] only has like 15 votes per post so it’s not very active. meanwhile /c/[email protected] has more like 70 upvotes per post on average. why is the casual conversations community so inactive?

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    For casual conversation, it is weird to use likes as metrics rather thsn the number of comments

    • Aniki@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      i see, however it’s not dull at all. i’m writing a book about the basics of biology. (genetics/biochemistry). i’d like some feedback :)

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        the place for that is among biologists, not random internet strangers.

        you looking in the wrong place.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Dullness is relaive and entirely subjective. As long as the content you’re writing isn’t too opaque to the non-science reader, I think it will fly.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    I make a post for casual conversation everyday. I’m hurt you didn’t notice.

    • Aniki@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      honestly i looked into the casual conversation community for the first time yesterday.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s not the platform. It’s the users, and the culture at large.

      It way easier to conduct things 10-20 years ago, than today.

      Just watch old Presidential debates from the 70s and 80s, you’ll be shocked how sophisticated they sound compared to today’s toddler level debates.

      in 2026 every moron thinks their opinion and feelings are the only relevant thing, and they actively seek to derail other people’s conversations because it upsets them for whatever reason… usually because they are too dumb to understand it.

      • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I used to do that in forum sites years ago. There’s a kind of exhilarating excitement to it. Especially when I’m “behind” and mass quoting and replying to each quote. It was also exhausting.

        I kind of miss it

    • Aniki@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      hmm ok. i’m mostly looking for a place to infodump about my current research project. and it should be lemmy, not IRC, because i want people to actually be able to read it at a later time for reference.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because the main casual conversation moved to piefed before tools like Lemmy federate had piefed support, so the user base got massively fractured simply because of lack of discovery across instances.

    That costs a ton of momentum

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Basically still Separated.

        The pidfed developer basically gave the lemmy federate dev a huge fuck you by banning his instance because he didn’t like the instance icon. As you can imagine this means Lemmy federate dev isn’t going to work on piefed support. However, very reasonably, he will accept any piefed support PRs the piefed dev may wish to submit.

        So piefed comms are like early Lemmy comms still, no discovery other then manual.

        • Nickelalloy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh okay, thanks for the clarification! What a shame it has become like this.

          It feels like infornation on this is so hard to get, everything is spread in tiny pieces around.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            That is the problem with decentralization… the discovery.

            However, people are fixing it, lemmy-federate is actively developed. I think the total daily active users has dipped a bit, but I’m still here to have conversations with people. Lemmy will grow, we just need to make it a great place first.

            Some of the lead architects of core infrastructure have “eccentric” personalities which create friction, but I’m hopeful we will get past that. You need unique people to solve unique problems.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree with EVERYONE here

      • not good at casual conversation - CHECK
      • participate in forums with some focus such as dull…. - CHECK
      • wouldn’t know what to do with conversation as unstructured as “casual” - CHECK
  • AskewLord@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    because there is no content there.

    and what content there is, is usually just spamming of boring inane nonsense by the same 1-3 people.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    A casual conversation would pass the time and the subject of the conversation would need to be common between both conversers. That’s why weather exists.