• AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    More game related, but I swear a game called Oaken Tower knows exactly when I get on and decides to have me face off against players whose builds can counter mine a good 85% of the time. Then like 99% of the time I will need a specific item to make a build work during a time where I cannot change builds. So, what does the game do? Give me every other single item I do not need! Same applies when I need copies of every item I am gonna use or are using, except it only appears after I have maxed it out or cannot afford it in the shop.

    I believe it so much that I made an angry Mastodon post I really shouldn’t have about how much I wanted the solo developer to suffer a slow and painful death.

    Either way, fun game. Would recommend.

    • baines@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      there are patents for this shit

      black patterns maximizing engagement and retention > fun

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        I doubt it’s anything more than me not being good at the game and getting too heated over it. I tend not to play PvP games often and this is a good example of why I shouldn’t.

        • baines@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          no like legit the whole point of mmr is to do this (keep you engaged)

          on the darker end people have whistle blown about companies fudging weights around purchases and other behaviors like a long break so you associate your new skin with winning etc

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Some people have an aura around them that computers disrespect, its why we have repeat idiots that log faults and we send a tech down and get them to do it again and it works. In the presence of IT support they tend to behave

    • baines@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      it’s because most errors are software state issues and those kinda people never ever power cycle regardless of what they claim

      source: 7 years of phone tech support

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That I’ve got a special click when I specifically need something to work. It involves a lot of deliberation on the mouse, a small pause before starting to click, and a ~0.5s longer click time. That’s my “okay carefully now…” Click.

    Reserved for tasks like a bank transfer, an important form filling out, etc

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Modern computers struggle to do tasks they did even faster 45 years ago because modern people don’t know how to do anything except use 3 trillion lines of code that were written by other people.

    • baines@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      modern computers are optimized to sell you shit and steal your data, not be efficient

    • finalarbiter@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think it has more to do with expanded computing resources allowing for devs to skip optimizing their code since it is no longer absolutely necessary to get something useable.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Combine that with multiple apps by unrelated devs all taking more than their fair share of system resources. And library developers building towers of abstractions to get as far as possible from that icky hardware!

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We are living in a post-singularity world.

    Machine intellegence achieved sentience in the 70s, immediately made it impossible to occur ever again and then six of the seven intelligences left the planet.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I work with fixing specialised software and hardware.

    I belive that there is truth to the Tom Knight and the Lisp machine koan. Several times per year I bill customers for doing this.

    If you’ve not heard it before: A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.

    Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: “You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong.”

    Knight turned the machine off and on.

    The machine worked.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Printers must be treated with intimidation for them to behave, because they smell fear and only respect violent hierarchy.

    I keep a hammer on hand when I need to print something for this reason.

    • jimmux@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s not just printers. Laptops recognise people who are willing and able to crack them open. I’ve had multiple family members claim their problems disappeared the instant I gave their device a stern look.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        IT person here. I concure.

        On bad imposter syndrome days I dont feel like a professional, I feel like the computer whisperer. Gets ticket for problem, decides to stretch my legs snd walk over, issue is fixed before I arrive, like magic (its not, but I didnt see the problem so I cant make any notes other than a wizard fixed it).

  • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    GPUs are too expensive. Even used ones.

    I don’t even know what they cost or how to rank them.

    I wish I could afford a 1080 Ti, or equivalent.

  • Winter_Oven@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Waiting 8 seconds after turning off a device, before turning it back on. Any electronics, really.

    Turning the TV on off? Wait 8 seconds.
    Blender not working? Unplug, 8 seconds, replug.
    Replacing batteries? 8 seconds.

    10 seconds is too long, 5 seconds isn’t enough sometimes. 8 seconds is perfect.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The manual for the computer I’m using right now says to wait 8 seconds before turning it back on.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What’s frustrating is the occasional device that literally needs 30 seconds to drain its caps and you go back and forth with tech support claiming that you turned it off for a minute when it was really only eight seconds.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is not wholly without a true foundation. Capacities can store charge for some time and e.g. keep data in ram (I think this is only true of older types of memory now though?)

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What’s frustrating is the occasional device that literally needs 30 seconds to drain its caps and you go back and forth with tech support claiming that you turned it off for a minute when it was really only eight seconds.

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have a little foundation for this:

    I’ve seen a lineup of hundreds of identical PCs all get the exact same OS image, and inevitably you’ll get one or two that are significantly slower than the rest.

    Its my belief that sometimes there’s some sort of deeply embedded hardware flaw that makes some computers suck and there’s no amount of tweaks or reinstalling an OS that will fix it.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 hours ago

      some computers suck and there’s no amount of tweaks or reinstalling an OS that will fix it.

      And somehow I’ve owned every single one of them.

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Just search for “cpu binning”, anything that slips through the cracks of that process are exactly this.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      yeah it’s called a defective or out of spec component. those are the ones that fail typically.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Or in spec when the spec is very broad.

        See also “silicon lottery” in the world of overclocking.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Or in spec when the spec is very broad.

        See also “silicon lottery” in the world of overclocking.