Idk about that. There are many uses for compute units beside training. Inference may still be possible. But also, I’m just remembering that time the PS3 was used as a super computer. If general purpose compute hardware is subsidized, I think gamers won’t be able to get it and instead it will get to the hands of corporations or research institutes for cheap compute hardware. Why spend 1k to get a sub-par machine when you can get the same one with say $500 (if valve subsidize it)
And people wonder why valve won’t subsidize their PC. If they do, they’ll run out fast. And not by gamers
You store git repo in your documents?!
Ahh, you have the new install. Yes that is a known issue. I was installing it before they did the switcheroo with their custom distribution QT6 webview (the root cause of the issue). If you have the old install it still works just fine
I imagine if you play MSFS you have a beefy PC to handle Affinity through WINE
Check out the proton rating site for space engineers. I forgot the specific but there’s a command line and proton version that works best for it. Another valid option is to have dual compositor (I use plasma and gamescope) since you can easily choose that on the login screen.
Affinity works using WINE. I think there also exists a repo where they packaged it into .appimage
Affinity can be installed on Linux via WINE just fine. There’s even a repo for it. Fusion360, of all things, also works the same way. WINE is not just for gaming
IMEI and GSM in general is one of those “industry standard” that are so heavily paywalled that the effort to reverse engineer it is pretty hard. You can look at osmocomm, the umbrella open source project that tries to make mobile communication more accessible and open
I can already feel that my Cooler Master mouse 2.4GHz dongle doesn’t need to get restarted / replugged every so often
It MUST spread. Like the article said, we should speak up and spread it anywhere we can. This is a good way to fight the legislation by playing by the rules
Sure you can only determine if “user is of age or not” with zero knowledge proof. But collect enough proof and statistics can de anonymize that anyway. How is no one addressing that?
Then why can’t QT provide the same benefit of delivering cross platform developing experience? See, that is the core issue. You write FOR the platform not for yourself. In the web space, the platform writes FOR you lest they want to break compliance with the rest of the web standard. When you are writing web application, you are writing program in a standard that the platform WILL follow instead of you following whatever the platform dictates at the time of their convenience
Developing cross platform native apps sucks a lot no matter the tech stack. Compared to web technologies where the burden to follow the spec is the platform if they wanted to have interop with the web, the dev doesn’t have to fight the platform.
Linus called that a good sign, while asserting that he is “much less interested in AI for writing code” and more interested in AI as a tool for maintenance, patch checking, and code review.
Linus knows where the actual problem is in the software development cycle. Not that human code slower but the approval of the code itself is slow.
That’s the thing. It doesn’t break it to the point of unusable unlike other patches I think. So the test didn’t catch this since performance is rarely a part of a test suite no?
You need to understand that testing the fix itself takes time. Especially if it is for a new hardware to make sure it doesn’t break other hardware somehow