• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Great move by Snapmaker. In considering buying a new printer soon I am very annoyed by how difficult it is to know beforehand how much functionality of a printer is locked behind cloud connectivity that can be remotely disabled at any point. I know Bambu is to avoid absolutely thanks to the very public backlash they got but what about the others?

    I know Prusa is a shining example of letting their customers own their devices but they are pricy. I didn’t know Snapmaker had the same kind of mentality until now thanks to that move.

    • fonix232@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Prusa is pricy because they make the de facto standards - including PrusaSlicer which is the base of OrcaSlicer/Bambu Studio.

      Bambu can sell cheaper for two reason:

      • limited research needed to make their own products - they’re just copying open patents and software, tuning it a little, and selling the package at manufacturing cost + profit margins
      • the CCP pouring a shitton of money into companies to subsidise them and allow them to undercut western competition. Bambu makes a printer for $1000, CCP pays $600 of it, Bambu sells for $600 - $200 profit
    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      You might check out the Consumer Rights Wiki, also started by Rossman. It’s crowd sourced, and lists anti-consumer BS like forced cloud subscriptions for a lot of companies.

      Just find a printer, look up the company there, and see how legit they are. There’s even a browser plugin that pops up on any website that has an entry on the wiki.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Wish they had the opposite. I feel like most people want to know who to go to, less so on who to avoid. I can see the usefulness in the list, but it’s backwards when people want to find someone

      • unmagical@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        My Prusa was tucked in between the cushions of my couch for a cross country move, left in storage for one year, and moved again before I just blew the first off and smashed out a perfect print from an SD card. That’s a solid enough performance I don’t think I’d consider any other brand.

        • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          The worst thing about Prusa is the knowledge that no matter what you buy, there will be an upgrade available to an even better one WAY too quickly, and then you’ll want that one too. It’s a trap, I tell you!

          j/k I still love my Prusa MK3S+, though the relentless upgrade temptation is real.

        • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I pulled mine out of storage after four years. Same thing, blew the dust off, plugged it in, expecting the worst. Nope, it just lit up and ran through the setup procedure. Set the z and printed perfectly, just like I had it set up when I put it in storage. I didn’t expect such a sensitive machine with such tight tolerances to just work.

          • unmagical@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Some require retentioning belts, readjusting the bed level, or other maintainance items before you can get a perfect print again.