• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    This is not a generational thing. Trying to make it a generational thing is meant to cause divide and deviate discussions about privacy away from the real culprits. Tech megacorporations. Users cannot be held liable for failing to fight indoctrination and propaganda. The proper answer is compassion, education and advocacy. Infighting and arguing only empowers the oppressor. Don’t play into their hands by making it a generational thing.

  • anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Which generation refused cookies?
    I feel like most look at me like I’m crazy, regardless of age, when I deny/only accept the functional cookies on sites every single visit.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t think the two groups of people named in this post have much overlap. They seem pretty distinct to me as well

    • nul42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      When the Financial Times published the article, “This Bug in Your PC is a Smart Cookie” on 12 February 1996 I remember quite a lot of people getting upset about it. At the time most were on dialup so you had a different IP assigned every time you connected so the idea you were being tracked in any way was a shock.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Should be denying all. I refuse to use websites that say there are “functional” or “required” cookies. That’s bullshit. Also use extension that block and/or scrub cookies.

      • Lena@gregtech.eu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Some cookies are useful, like the ones keeping you logged in. Not all cookies are created with the sole purpose of tracking you.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            No, but if they have other cookies, the options range between “yes” and “only essential”. The popup is for the other ones, but it also notifies you that you won’t get zero, which they kinda do need to say if the popup shows up.

      • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Apart from keeping you logged in, like the other commenter mentioned, cookies can for example be used to save the theme you are using (light/dark) or the language you picked. It would be annoying to have to reselect that every time you move to a different subpage.

  • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    There’s no need to turn everything into a genration war. Computer literacy and a sense for maintaining privacy comes and goes with different groups of people depending on their upbringing. The ones who cared about their privacy to the point that they would refuse cookies on every site are definitely not the ones who roll over and let the AI agents access all of their data. A lack of good education and deliberate influence of the advertisement and tech industry has led us to this point and snarky flamebait on twitter isn’t getting us anywhere.

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I agree. Op reasoning is flawed in many ways: both the relation to generations, and the assumption that people who do x are destined to do y.

      The most infuriating part of this statement is the supposed relation to generations. It is yet another discriminatory behaviour which usually goes under the radar. Just like it happens within sexism, op has needlessly correlated things to age.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’m pretty sure the Venn diagram of “refuses cookies” and “refuses AI” is a circle.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Please stop with the generational strife nonsense. It only serves as an attempt to distract from class war. We are all in this together against the rich bastards, regardless of our age.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    gen x here. I still refuse cookies. I also refuse AI.

    most the people I see promoting AI are millennials and gen z.

    🤷 whatever though, nobody will listen to me anyway.

  • CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Is it that bad? I see there are people giving full access to AI but I always thought it wasn’t so much to refer to it as “a generation”.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      It’s very much not a generational thing. More gen alpha might use AI because they’re young and keep up with trends more, but there’s still plenty that denounce it and plenty of boomers who accept it.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        More gen alpha might use AI because they’re young and keep up with trends more

        That’s not entirely true. There are cases where gen alpha students revolted against AI usage. One of the incidents was about the usage of Chromebooks which forced students to use AI - bottom line is, people where upset.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Literally didn’t read the rest of my sentence.

          there’s still plenty that denounce it

          You’re arguing my point for me that it’s not a generational thing

          • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Treat it as an accompanying argument rather than arguing a point for your sake. Its just a different perspective exceplifying the point by focusing on the impacted group.