For example, I love to sing. However, only one other person in my life has ever heard me sing and I haven’t seen that person in years. I’m not sure I’m good at singing but I think I can hit the notes well enough.

    • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Democratic-lottocracy where the canditades are drawn from the elligble population, but where people vote who they want to represent them in senate would be fire.

      Bonus points if the terms end at different times. Like if there would be 200 seats and 4 years terms, there would be elections for 50 seat every year.

      • grranibal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That would be roughly 1 election per week which feels very very draining. If you combine multiple election in a single day it would be too much for people to carefully consider every option

        Maybe the solution could be that some of them are chosen elected like you said, while other seats are given randomly

        • MrFinnbean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Im thinking more like 200 seats divided by province or state or what ever is applicable and voting only representatives from your own area so it would be pretty close to parlamentic elections we have here now.

          • grranibal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            What about:

            • citizens are chosen randomly to get regional seats
            • elections are held regionally so that x of these citizens get national-wide seats
    • wraekscadu@vargar.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean it does have legitimate narrow use cases imo ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      Everywhere? Nawww not rlly