• Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    food. I’d give it out for free in an effort to destroy the corporate slime that is currently infecting this planet

  • 001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Influence. I want to be able to convince everybody with power around the world to actively support a transition away from a system that’s based on hierarchy and coercion to a decentralized and cooperative one.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I could get behind that.

      But wealth is power, and power does not corrupt so much as it attracts the corruptible. You would need to work with all manner of sociopaths and malignant narcissists. And these are people who have the least justification for existing in a polite society.

      Plus, they would also continue to be parasites on civilization, and continue to pathologically hoard more wealth than they could possibly spend in a million lifetimes.

      Honestly, a guillotine is a lot simpler and a lot faster. Take out the top 0.01% of civilization, and the remaining members of the Parasite Class will not fight when you implement 99% top-tier tax rates, close all of the high-wealth loopholes, and build proper social frameworks that benefit everyone.

      And this starts with the political system, with a high-tech direct-participation democracy which eliminates all politicians in favour of letting everyone vote on all issues. This requires a foundation with a population that is well educated in critical thinking and bullshit detection (which would destroy all conservatism in the first place), and an economic system (even modified capitalism) that meets everyone’s needs so everyone would have the headspace to deal with societal questions without being forced to always focus on economic survival. Without this political framework, socialism/communism of any form would continue to be corrupted and co-opted by strongmen and tyrants.

      Because when you look at any attempt to implement communism in the past, it never survived beyond a few months to maybe a year or so. Sure, Russia had its revolution in 1917, but by 1918 Russian communism was effectively dead; taken over by an authoritarian kleptocracy no different than a feudal system.

        • rekabis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Communism can very much be decentralized, and in fact a correct implementation tends to be exactly that.

          Because that’s where “communism” the term comes from - community, communal, etc…

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            In practice, it isn’t, usually. None of the communist states extant today or historically had a decentralized system without hierarchies.

            • rekabis@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Which is why these were never communist states, any more than North Korea is democratic, or the old East Germany was a republic.

              Just because these states wore the word “communism” like a thin veneer of legitimacy, does not a communist state make.

              • Yliaster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Well I’m glad you can say that.

                In my experience there are people who defend both China and “DPRK” as a communist paragon with reasoning that is although extensive dodges any real criticism of China (from either an external standpoint, or from within a communist pov).

                It was my impression that such “tankies” are the primary base of communists (or common enough for it to be a problem), which pushed me away from it.

                • rekabis@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Real communism has a massive flaw in that it is too idealistic and fails to account for human corruption and the pursuit of power. Especially since communism is all about equalizing power among the people. Which is also how it has always been co-opted and destroyed from within shortly after it has been implemented.

                  This is why I fight against calling any current country “communist”, because those countries so severely violate everything that makes a state communist. These are authoritarian kleptocracies, nothing more. They use “communism” as a thin veneer of legitimacy over a fetid, rotting carcass of dictatorship that violently oppresses the people.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Absolutely nothing because having unlimited of anything never is a good thing for anyone, especially not yourself

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        There is no unlimited air, there is no unlimited anything in the physical world, really…

        But having said that, yeah, we need air and water in “unlimited” quantities, anything else is optional