Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So…topic, basically.

I’m not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what’s in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let’s have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Some commenter will point it out and will get enough upvotes to be visible on first glance. It’s not perfect but good enough for me.

    I don’t necessarily disagree here, however there is always the edge case of a certain overly-vocal group being 100% anti-AI, and that any usage of AI is considered a crime against humanity.

    I’m not part of that group per se, but I also want full disclosure. If you used AI to get things going and handled it yourself from there, that’s one thing. Constant commits from Claude or whatever is a whole different bucket of shit I refuse to touch.

    • tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, the crowd will point it out if the author didn’t and you can decide what to make of it. It’s probably discouraging to post slopware if you know you’re in for a lot of criticism, I’m not sure if it’s better or worse than being forced to flag it [AI].