I think it’s not about technology itself, but about (corporate) governance of tech companies and therefore not fitting very well in this community (but the post can stay imho). However, I find [email protected] less suitable. To be honest, the main [email protected] would be adequate in my opinion. Maybe it would need to be contextualized better: Why do you think this is a solarpunk approach to governance? Are there examples that work like that? What could go wrong? And so on to give it more depth and not just be a “news” link
- 0 Posts
- 2 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 5th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.


I agree and only meant if you wanted to post in [email protected]. Because in my opinion, it is about solrapunk theory and how services can be provided and governed. But it would need some context about theory, at least for me, since I’m not too deep into governance concepts.