NPM yet again because it was one of the examples I used that you failed to address

I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

I’m pretty sure I noted your demonstated lack of reading comprehension, not ignorance. Doesn’t seem to have improved in the last 2 weeks.

Hopefully manufacturing irrelevant scenarios works out for you in your career.

That’s ironic.

I also never used insults… maybe you’re recalling the posts where you called me a “clown” and “fuckwit”?

I only stated that there are more security problems for the average user related to: doing a web search, clicking the first link, and executing a basically random binary downloaded from some website, ie the standard way of downloading software on windows; than there is to using a package manager.

I clearly acknowleged that both package managers and the windows method are vulnerable to supply chain attacks.

You just wanted to create an argument, and it’s genuinely hilarious that it’s still in your mind. I had forgotten you existed 😂

Going by your logic

You do quite a lot of talking for me and telling me what my position/logic is. It’s almost like you’re arguing with yourself rather than any of the points I’ve stated. Well, enjoy arguing with yourself still, somehow.

Huh? I have never claimed they are?

In cybersecurity, perfect is not a thing. You can only mitigate risks within a threat model.

He is a jazz legend, yeah…

These Linux communities on Lemmy are just so damn cynical.

No, it emphasises that there’s no reason to use NTFS unless you’re mounting a windows drive, like I said. It does not imply anything about the “nicheness” of the one usecase, although, yes, it in fact is super duper niche. Being niche does not mean unimportant.

Most all linux systems will never see an NTFS formatted partition.

This isn’t an argument against increased compatibility, which is only a good thing.

That’s how exceptions work, yes. I’m glad you’ve confirmed that you understood correctly what I was communicating with language. What’s the problem, you’re offended by the word “literally” or…?

??? Yeah, that’s exactly what I already said?

unless you’re mounting a windows drive

I’m all for more compatibility but there’s also literally no reason to ever use NTFS unless you’re mounting a windows drive

How much VRAM?

Then moderate? What is your point?

If you’re demanding a moderation-free internet community, good luck!

There’s also a character limit, so base64 is not really practical.

Personally, I have never seen any development move faster than artificial intelligence

You must not be very familiar, then. We’ve been on diminishing returns and a plateau for several years now with no major leaps in performance, no potential answers to the flaws in LLMs, and no AI company securing a real lead over any others, or even a profitable business model for AI.

There have been a lot of inference-level tricks, like CoT to maintain coherence, MoE to make inference more cost effective, and techniques to extend the context windows; but literally no groundbreaking or foundational changes to the transformer architecture. At all. And they’re still hitting the same performance and scaling constraints.

We’re basically stagnant, throwing more training tokens at models, but not getting any significant gains back from it anymore.

No, we are nowhere near AGI and do not even know where to begin making gains towards it. The fundamentally different agentic framework and “cognitive harness” you describe are quite literally fantasy delusions that don’t exist… did an LLM tell you about them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatbot_psychosis