I’ve always thought the better recourse for problematic labels is for the targets of their denigration to embrace and claim them as their own. This diminishes, and potentially eliminates, the power of their oppressors to wield it in an incendiary way, and they can then choose to suppress its use once the imbalance has shifted sufficiently.

Note: this is from the perspective of someone who largely embodies the peak of unearned social and demographic privilege, so season with NaCl to suit.

AI doesn’t exist.

LLMs have vanishingly narrow legitimate justifiable use cases.

Copyright is an intrinsically hostile environment within which to conduct collaborative activities.

01
11
01
10

LLMs exist, AI doesn’t.

Anyone who calls LLMs ‘AI’ is betraying they don’t understand what the labels are. Their opinions on the subject should be summarily dismissed, and ridiculed if they persist.

LLMs have vanishingly narrow legitimate use cases, none of which have proven justifiable to be wielded unsupervised.