That’s kind of irrelevant for a third party resolving where network traffic is coming from. They aren’t connecting to OP, OP is connecting to them. Assuming their firewall even supports reverse DNS lookups, it’d actually resolve to something like <Ipaddress>.res.ispdomain.com or something weird. And since it’s dynamic there’d be no consistent domain to give.

Can you share photos of the underside of the remote and/or light where it lists either “FCC ID” or “Contains FCC ID”? I can’t find a listing on it anywhere to figure out what it does, and a LOT of those labels for radio frequency in Amazon images are straight up lies. There’s so much noise on those drop-shipped items.

All 3 mechanisms are native to a yubikey, and do not require yubikey-specific software/drivers to function as they use USB standards like FIDO2, keyboard for HMAC, and PIV/CCID for OpenPGP.

FIDO2 is built-in out-of-the-box, HMAC just requires adding the key to HMAC on slot 1 or 2 (tap vs long-hold key-inputs) using the personalization tool, or using gpg(2) to card-edit for OpenPGP.

None of these require YK software to operate.

Yes, I’m aware that ML is a field of computer math artificial intelligence. But purposefully trotting that out is tantamount to doing unpaid work for Sam Altman at this point since in parlance nearly everyone uses “AI” as shorthand for modern generative AI systems as well as the hype itself.

Which thus…no, it wasn’t called AI before, it was generally referred to as machine learning or neural networks with that implying it was AI (math) before it became labeled as AI (hype).

This feels like really unnecessary pedantry.

Yep. In the fix I linked I set it up to default to a word if it fails the template instead, so it’ll then check for a match to that word (“fail”) and if so it just falls back to 5 minutes and will tell me as much.

Going to be a hell of a lot better about that in the future though. Was definitely a rookie mistake on my part to assume that just because it’d worked every time I’d tested it, used it, and with timers and all thus far that it would always work 100% of the time. Why assume when you can validate? I do in code I write… Guess I don’t think about it in the same way with HA as much, oops.

I do all three every time I do something new, it’s basically mandatory for me. Every time I did it correctly did numerics tested over and over via voice itself. Timers always behave and require that as well.

This was just the first time, after anxiety had faded, it had failed to transcribe in a useful fashion.

Makes me want to look into more-predictable STT systems.

deleted by creator

Reporting like that really is something I should be doing more of. I think about it lots at work and when I go home I guess I often turn off that part.

Speech to text, not AI. No one called it AI until the tech execs started purposefully conflating them all to make folks who say they’re “anti-AI” look bad against all other machine learning. And now even fucking Nuance calls DragonSpeak “AI” even though it’s always been machine learning-based since it first started.

It’s one of those stupid things that would just need a toggle to force transcription context. Probably works flawlessly with Nabu Casa’s STT, but even though I pay them for it I want it local. Hell, I’m pretty sure Dragon even has (or had) switches for forcing certain processing methods.

Thank you, I needed the laugh for this x3

Hopefully my peppers aren’t dying from being drowned, nor my other plants. Guess I gotta feed them when I get home from work!

I set it up as just a sentence automation, not as a separate script being fired where that’d have caused an error. I’ve not found a means of forcing validation like that in sentence automations, only in custom sentences/intents (never quite gotten a handle on those)