It’s true, if it’s possible someone is doing it as we speak. Doesn’t mean they should, of that it will be a good thing, but someone’s hard at work on it.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 1st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
ilmagico@lemmy.worldto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Would you trust an open source software maintained by a developer who you disagree with politically (or otherwise don't like the developer)?
0·11 months agoOk first of all: GrapheneOS is great, probably the best alternative Android OS, but their PR skills are rock bottom. Still, many ignore that due to how good it is.
With that said, I don’t believe their claim that it’s impossible for them to target a user with a malicious OTA: their reason is basically that the update server never even knows who is downloading, and so it can’t send a different file to just one user. That’s true, but thet could, in theory, make a single OTA that everybody gets, but checks for a specific IMEI or other device ID and only there enables some malicious payload.
I trust them not to do it, for many reasons, but technically they could. I also don’t think they’d do it to Louis, despite the beef they have with him.
Ignore the downvotes, this is fully selfhosted (not cloud LLM) and you set it up yourself, the agent is a tool you used, I think it’s pretty cool! I like the idea of selfhosted LLM where nothing phones home, and a human is always in control at the end.