Goats under economic interest are ugly, I have no clue what your point is by critiquing the solar panel system for a (variable) farming method

I mean we can agree here then no?

Pls enlighten me

I mean u can easily replace the farming method under it…?!

Never made my point for a farming method here, u can just swap this solar system with syntropic agriculture or whatever your heart desires… no?

i dont follow, maybe its because im not native english/american? id be happy if you could make the point clearer for me here…cause currently youre discribing the thing but there seems to be no full argument without further context?

look, im car free by choice - couldve owned a newer A4 avant. So we agree on the parking lots in its prevalance are too much.

This doesnt change the fact that the whole sheep input is still absurd - no matter how romanticized the cartoony picture looks like… the realist view on your idealist idea could be “agrar solar” -> here an example picture

interestingly enough - planetary boundries include more essential parameters than greenhouse gases if people would be interested in more food for thought.

like degradation of soil to a level of unusable (N- & P-cycles) due to 75% of landuse for animal food ( “Joseph Poore and Thomas Nemecek (2018)” where sheep are “just” a small percentile since we breed thousand of millions of other human-made animal breeds) or usable freshwater supplies getting more and more critical decade after decade…

this post to be fair was about where to put solar panels

“No profit, not work-ey” - unless we change the system to make accumulation impossible of course

anything else would be ignorant to compare to the commonness of parking lots - as in not worth to compare to begin with, like the handful of animal sanctuaries or whatever u’d think of here

“most people dont share your beliefs” is not an argument for anything. imagine people saying that for a pro slavery work stance. same with “weve done that before”.

but sure correct my wording after making a fake argument, must be a very good sign for the confidence in your stance. :D Of course youre talking about sheep for wool, what else would you call a “win” here?

And again, it is not a win, reread my first response, it literally already answered. Im sure deep down u see its pretty hard to not derail without addressing that/admitting theres unbendable, simple contradiction

the sheep, we envision when someone says sheep, wouldnt exist without humanity. its also -like all other bred animal breeds with similar situations- serious damage for their bones to carry 10kg’s of extra fur(bred to be wooly).

So no, this is not a win-win