

Dividing up the clothing by lots is such an abomination.


Dividing up the clothing by lots is such an abomination.


Well the “that” could be that the friend’s comment was that the image was insulting to Catholics, or the “that” could be referring to the specific reaction. It basically needed some better comma usage because there is a difference between:
His reaction was, that the image was, insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.
and
His reaction was that, the image, was insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.
I guess the vagueness comes from the double “was” usage.


His reaction was that the image was insulting to the Catholic religion and blasphemous.
You friend’s reaction to the image was insulting and blasphemous? Or, was his reaction to the image itself was insulting and blasphemous?


Jesus flipped nicer tables than this.

On top of that, Samsung is ending its SMS and suggesting Google messenger as an alternative. I am not looking to train a chatGPT with my private text messages