People’s remarks have a theme that they want to know what the video will be about. I feel the title and description fit the criteria. I also feel it is excessive to ask for a summary. That takes far longer to write.

So what information is really missing here. The offending VPN is in the title. Anyone that wants to know more can use the keyword for an article of their choosing. The description is to the point that the video covers how FB wiretapped people with said VPN.

That description that is highlighted

Yeah, and I am explaining that I feel my post was sufficient to that criteria explaining what the video will be about.

A summary is a big ask and you’re not entitled to my time for your convenience.

What kind of tree?

Writing a summary takes work; which you are asking me to do to convince you to watch. I am sharing something I think is worth sharing; particularly as it may be used for people you know who are new to privacy. The title is edited to remove the cliff hanger and the description states exactly what the video will be about. If you don’t find that adequate for your time that is your problem. I don’t find it adequate to use more of my time to convince you further.

Please tell me what about the description or title are misleading. They have all the keywords you need to find an article if you really care about the material being written.

Being asked to write a summary is excessive. I already put a concise description.

Ohh look tribalism and bashing your allies

So what about the description I wrote is unclear about the video topic?

Idk I see it all clear on my end. The description is clear clear what the topic will be about.

I looked at the hosted instances and none were working for me. The filter is a reasonable request. Being asked to write out a summary is not. I wrote the offending VPN on the tittle and a statement on what the video covers, that was still not to @[email protected] standards. They are not entitled to my time to add metadata to things to their satisfaction.

then its a dogshit description

That is your opinion. In mine it is concise and to the point. You’re not entitled to my time to make metadata on topics to your liking.

Also the whole “in every possible language” thing is pedantic and stupid and I think we both know that.

It is, but a part of your grievance was that you didn’t get the language. The German bit is added by the lemmy front end.

How FB wiretapped millions with a VPN

If its not to your liking that is unfortunate. You can also make a comment to elaborate and contribute to the community and discussion.

Maybe the community can help me out here. The title and the description already state when the topic is. If they want to know more they can watch the video. If they don’t have 20min then they can come back to it later.

If your client does not display the description that is not my issue. Also the text is in English at the very bottom. Even if it was not I cannot be making multiple summaries in every possible language to please you.

Do you see the text at the bottom? Some information on what the video is about. If you prefer the video in text form consider contributing that.

I have been wanting to get into coding for fun again and do some pet projects. Bit of a paralysis from choice.

Its unfortunate it is not to your liking.

I posted a video I feel is worth sharing; particularly as it is an important topic. If you feel a summary is need it then contribute it. There already is a description on what the video is about.

Please contribute the summary.