According to researcher justhaifei1, the vulnerability was responsibly disclosed to Adobe Security
No, this is not responsible disclosure; the guy notified Adobe at the same time as publication. He claims to justify by saying he is seeing this in the wild, but “responsible” does not mean what he says that means.
Another way to consider it is that performance gains in Cachy are six to eighteen months ahead of “stable” Linux. But that performance increase does mean things are more likely to break with rolling updates.
Not curious, Canonical is widely seen as antithetical to open source ethos. But it is stable and has put in a lot of work for vendor support, which is why so many distros (including Mint) are downstream derivatives from Ubuntu.
If this is accurate, why does Fedora use zram by default?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM
Seems like the author has some legitimate credentials, and I have explicitly noticed the OOM on Fedora SilverBlue when processing shaders in Steam (possible memory leak in Baldurs Gate 3, but still a hard crash when OOM).
In short, I want Linux to work for me and other technically-minded enthusiasts […] Is this an elitist view? I don’t think so.
Is it elitist to gatekeep Linux for technically minded enthusiasts? Yes.
Especially when they end the article with “I for one hope it never does”. Definition of gatekeeping and toxic elitism.
And since it seems like you’re not shying away from shows with some fucked up things kids probably shouldn’t have watched but are kinda formative anyways