Ahh got it. Yeah, that makes sense in that we wouldn’t allow a child to do something sexually in a movie.
Again I have not seen the movie and glancing at the wiki didn’t make me immediately think there is no way to make this movie in the current times.
I still don’t understand. I saw the wiki linked earlier as well. Is the claim that a film about a child being sexually abused cannot be made today? Because I don’t think that is the case.
Or is it because there would probably be an actor that is 18 cast? I don’t see that being a different film. If you want to argue that casting a 16 year old or an 18 year old changes the film, then you could say that not casting Brooke Shields changes the film. It seems like a ship of theseus argument at that point.
If your argument is something else, I’m interested to hear. I had never heard of this film before and have not seen it, so I could very well be missing something.
I haven’t seen this movie, but are the required changes casting an adult for nudity in the film? Was that not a thing in the 70s?
A lot of the blues legends are gone and a large number of Americans would be upset that they hate Illinois Nazis.
Yeah that makes perfect sense. Having not seen the movie, I don’t know the weight of that but can imagine.
I was trying to understand and linking the Wikipedia page wasn’t really explaining it.