Personally, i dream of a stateless, tag/attribute-based, tree-less operating system. “directories” would not be neccessary but a tag could be displayed as one in file managers. Want to load a library? type:library, name:xyz it is.
Stuff is there on the disk anyway, you just have to identify it.
But that would require the whole system and the tooling made for this.
But maybe we get there; since the young generation isn’t used to file trees anymore.
I think what you’re looking for is simply an indexer + UI that sorts your filesystem by tags rather than by directory structure. Not sure if that’s as beneficial as you imagine it to be, but IIRC KDE allows you to do something like that in Dolphin.
No, they always have to keep a index uptodate. And no synch (or even compatibility) with other such tooling. Only thing that comes close currently is xattributes some fs support. But they are wholly a undefined blank slate.
Personally, i dream of a stateless, tag/attribute-based, tree-less operating system. “directories” would not be neccessary but a tag could be displayed as one in file managers. Want to load a library? type:library, name:xyz it is.
Stuff is there on the disk anyway, you just have to identify it.
But that would require the whole system and the tooling made for this.
But maybe we get there; since the young generation isn’t used to file trees anymore.
Edit: ok, scratch the kernel, it could work.
I think what you’re looking for is simply an indexer + UI that sorts your filesystem by tags rather than by directory structure. Not sure if that’s as beneficial as you imagine it to be, but IIRC KDE allows you to do something like that in Dolphin.
No, they always have to keep a index uptodate. And no synch (or even compatibility) with other such tooling.Only thing that comes close currently is xattributes some fs support. But they are wholly a undefined blank slate.About advantages, no broken paths would be one.