People who proudly boast about how they never spend a dime on Epic Games, in their store, but has hundreds of free games to play with no intent to play them. Like, I don’t know who is supposed to be impressed by that. Not to mention, that’s not really a good method of protesting if you’re someone who hates Epic Games.
You’re still spending the time and effort, not to mention even bothering to have an account with them to begin with, to redeem free games that they give away. Who are you seriously trying to impress or what message are you trying to convey? Because all I see are contradictions and ironies.
It wasn’t an exclusionary statement. Knowing something about football doesn’t mean you can’t also know something about survival, budgeting, etc. Their point was that knowing anything about football is probably better than not.
E.g. “All knowledge might be useful and should be valued as a positive thing.”
I’m sorry but I don’t think the knowledge of knowing who won the Super Bowl 20 years ago will serve any relevance about how I’m trying to research and diagnose a medical issue with my health. Not to mention what could possibly go wrong if things are left unchecked, so I don’t think also the knowledge of who started as the running back on the 3rd week in the last season of football would help there either.
I largely agree with you, but they do make a fair point: all knowledge has some value. Football trivia won’t help you in your research, but general knowledge of football might help you break the ice in a social setting where you’d otherwise feel awkward or out of place.
That’s a sentiment I get every day when teaching maths. Many do not value maths because they can’t see any immediate benefits. What I’ve learned is that you never know what knowledge you might need in the future.
Knowledge is knowledge and everything is of some value. Maybe not the greatest value at all times, but some value. One should strive to have as much knowledge about as many things as possible.
You’re still misunderstanding it, lol