• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not up to the systemd team to decide for you what your risk tolerance is. They’re just providing a means to be compliant should you want/need it.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Exactly. I don’t get it. No matter how you lean politically, if you’re part of the dev community not just making software but building Linux - there’s an inherent sense of freedom and liberty in your endeavors. So unless these guys are long-seeded poison pills, I just don’t get the mentality. Don’t do it. Let it be someone else’s job. A someone else who is theoretical.

        It just surprises me is all. In Linux of all places. One of the last remaining bastions of truly open, free, transparent and cooperative, voluntary yada yada. All that. It doesn’t gel with licking boots and willingly doing this shit without being forced. Also, they’re literally spitting on their devoted users and encouraging them to change to a different system.

    • TheMadBeagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a take I think makes the decision make more sense to me (if this is the reasoning), letting the user opt into compliance rather than forcing their hand.