so they would have to argue what counts as a transformative work of plagiarism. how much of a stolen painting you have to paint over before it’s no longer stolen.
they have previously argued that llm output is transformative itself, but that’s been struck down. i’m not sure what the next avenue they will take is but they will definitely take it.
so they would have to argue what counts as a transformative work of plagiarism. how much of a stolen painting you have to paint over before it’s no longer stolen.
I’m not a lawyer, no idea what would they argue, I just know the lawyer price beats being right many times.
they have previously argued that llm output is transformative itself, but that’s been struck down. i’m not sure what the next avenue they will take is but they will definitely take it.