• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not unfair to say that people who carry water for candidates who support genocide long after the election is over support genocide, since they’re still supporting genocidal candidates when nothing else is at stake.

    • NerdyTimesOrWhatever@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      This I can somewhat agree with. Thats why I said we need a new method of voting. Supporting someone for being “less murdery” is insane. It doesnt mean you or I, who voted for (despite having issues with) Harris, are evil or support genocide.

      Undefined centrist democrats are also not a monolith, saying they all have the same opinions says a lot of weird stuff about you that Im sure arent true. You just havent thought about how youre classifying “enemies” or how you view groups who generally disagree with you.

      Its like hating pizza because some of them have pineapples on them, or because some are too cheesy. Well, thats a chill version at least.

      Unless supporting genocide and wanting to be represented by genocidal monsters is the only qualifier? Id agree with you there, but still say tone down the agressive “you must like genocide” meter.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Undefined centrist democrats are also not a monolith, saying they all have the same opinions says a lot of weird stuff about you that Im sure arent true.

        The leaders of the centrist wing support genocide. Schumer, Biden, Harris, the entire group that caucuses with Republicans to spam money at Israel. Anyone who sticks with them doesn’t have a problem with that.