• Krudler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s really not ok.

    If FOSS is going to make headway in business and among the non-technical, names should be descriptive and not based on some edgy humor a dev thinks is high comedy.

      • yoevli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        “Git” is only really a word in British English which implicitly gives it lower worldwide cultural penetration than a general English term. For most non-British programmers (and honestly I would imagine many British ones given how ubiquitous Git VC is now), “Git” refers to the software first and the pejorative second, if they’ve even heard of the latter before.

    • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Like “plasma”?

      Yeah names is important, but come on, Blender?

      Gimp is only a problemi for an handfull of english speaker americans. 90% of people in the world dont care.

      • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        GIMP is much more memorable for good or bad. I got over the name like 5mins after I first learned about it years ago. WLBR is so bland outside of the spelling. At least Blender kind of sounds like it blends elements to make something, and Plasma sounds like it would look nice. WLBR sounds frumpy/bland (though I would like to know what it will stand for), which is about as bad as trying too hard to sound “fresh/sexy” from a marketing standpoint. Maybe they could have gone with GRIP (GNU Raster Image Program) if the actual concern was about “offending” people while still being easy to remember? Idk, I suck at naming things.

    • fratermus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      If the name were the problem then why doesn’t someone fork the project and change only the name? <- actual question, not trying to be a smartass

      In either case they are starting from ~zero name recognition.