what bothers me most is that the concept of degrowth isn’t even possible to contemplate to these numpties. This economic model is failing, yes, but the article does not actually propose to consider the deeper reasons. “Economic growth” must be pursued at all costs according to these fucking twats… oh? Really? Why? When we have energy constraints, how the fuck can this even be possible, yanno? They don’t even consider the reality of energy descent being inevitable, and that we are now staring it in the face.

I’m so tired of not being allowed to talk about this to 99% of people, too.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    we should be seeing build outs of better electrified rail transport and way better electrified freight rail rollout, (and ffs gauge standisaton) etrucks and evans for the last mile, many people then won’t need a ecar if they don’t want one.

    I agree that money to rich folks to buy more ecars is a shitty way of doing it.