I want the same as you, except, I don’t think that people should suffer because they don’t conform to my concept of moral value.
Second paragraph:
Also, stop fucking projecting your violence into me.
So you’re regressing to weird hyperbolic statements to try to characterized me as immoral. I think that’s you wanting me to conform your “moral values”.
This isn’t a discussion about morals, it’s a discussion about how your ideology has some massive gaps because you think ideology is more important than know how things work. So you didn’t bother to learn how complex people’s jobs are, because work doesn’t matter to you.
Must’ve gone to a university that taught you how to be part of the management class to have this level of disrespect for people that actually work for a living. In a few years you’ll swap your leftist manifesto for a corporate policy manual because you really don’t want to have a job that involves actual work. You just want to repeat a narrative you’re told to repeat and get money for it. You’ll fit in well with corporate management someday.
Yet, here we are. With a bunch of personal attacks, again. And still, you don’t address the fact that your ideology is that people should go hungry because they don’t work the same way that you do. Am I the one being disrespectful and blinded by ideology? Am I the one disconnected from the working class? Again, where are you getting all of these weird hang ups about me? You don’t know me, my ideology, my education, my background or my work. I think you are just projecting like a mad man. “There’s no free lunch” means that you are OK with people going hungry and children starving. Just accept your worldview is violent and destructive. Check yourself, because all you are assuming about me isn’t true.
You bought the class warfare bait, hook, line and sinker. You’ll rather fight with me, someone who probably has 90% of the same ideological values as you. Instead of fighting with the corporate oligarchs that taught you that some people don’t deserve to eat.
First paragraph:
Second paragraph:
So you’re regressing to weird hyperbolic statements to try to characterized me as immoral. I think that’s you wanting me to conform your “moral values”.
This isn’t a discussion about morals, it’s a discussion about how your ideology has some massive gaps because you think ideology is more important than know how things work. So you didn’t bother to learn how complex people’s jobs are, because work doesn’t matter to you.
Must’ve gone to a university that taught you how to be part of the management class to have this level of disrespect for people that actually work for a living. In a few years you’ll swap your leftist manifesto for a corporate policy manual because you really don’t want to have a job that involves actual work. You just want to repeat a narrative you’re told to repeat and get money for it. You’ll fit in well with corporate management someday.
Yet, here we are. With a bunch of personal attacks, again. And still, you don’t address the fact that your ideology is that people should go hungry because they don’t work the same way that you do. Am I the one being disrespectful and blinded by ideology? Am I the one disconnected from the working class? Again, where are you getting all of these weird hang ups about me? You don’t know me, my ideology, my education, my background or my work. I think you are just projecting like a mad man. “There’s no free lunch” means that you are OK with people going hungry and children starving. Just accept your worldview is violent and destructive. Check yourself, because all you are assuming about me isn’t true.
You bought the class warfare bait, hook, line and sinker. You’ll rather fight with me, someone who probably has 90% of the same ideological values as you. Instead of fighting with the corporate oligarchs that taught you that some people don’t deserve to eat.