• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    Apparently, covering ~12% of the Australian Outback with solar panels would generate enough electricity to meet 100% of global energy (electricity, heating, transport) needs?!

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      If that’s true, the problem would be storing and transporting it. Sending electricity via wires is massively inefficient and limited in range.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        I didn’t propose it as a viable solution, but more-so as a thought experiment or proof of concept.

        A proper implementation would be pretty decentralised to minimise transmission loss where possible, and complemented with whatever analogue energy storage system makes sense locally (hydro dams/kinetic/molten salt/lithium/sodium batteries etc.).

        Solar is also not always the solution for colder climates, but in those places we can opt for geothermal or wind sources where feasible, otherwise transmit surplus energy from warmer climates as an absolute last resort.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      THAT is how we should do world domination. Want to take over the world? Provide sustainable infrastructure and renewable resources.