Ethical incest, obviously, is the safe, intimate relations between consenting, non-groomed adult family members with no intention to procreate and taking preventative measures against procreation and unethical power dynamics. Obviously.
Now, I get the shiggerwillies from thinking about my actual family members, but I love incest role play with really freaky bitches n boombadders. As such, I don’t give af if some long lost brother n sister meet on the internet and fall in love and go on to take over the world, figuratively, with their combined vestige in Christ, literally.
What say you, random internet stranger?
Consenting adults can do what they want, so long as they’re not hurting anyone else. It’s nobody else’s business.
What about their future selves?
Weird but I don’t give a fuck if you aren’t hurting anyone and you do it where I don’t have to be aware of it.
So, the dumpster outside my apartment is acceptable? Got it.
I only fuck your mom.
She’s dead with AIDS
Who do you think gave it to her?
I HAVE NO IDEA! NO ONE TELLS ME ANYTHING!
…prolly God, like he gave Mary crabs…
Yeah with those exact stipulations it’s probably fine. But it’s so common for there to be power dynamics in a family that it should still be frowned upon by default.
I have to agree. In the same vein of thought, while I am minor attracted and believe there are fringe cases where age isn’t exactly representative of a person’s capability to think long term or consent, I believe our culture should not uphold that as good, for in making it “good” invites harm.
I don’t have any desire to do anything regretful, but at the same time I understand that our culture being geared towards “kill all pedophiles” actively HARMS children, in that it makes the active ones hide to create pockets of hidden abuse.
I think if we as a society can reach a point where we radically accept others and do not judge them while assisting in helping them be better and whilst still maintaining the security apparatuses of our culture in the occident, we will make the most stable society as we as a whole go on into the seventh day of global telepathic internet and each person diversifies into their authentic self, to transcend that to become a perfect being.
Couldn’t care less about what consenting adults do.
You care enough to comment
How high are you? You literally asked for people’s opinions
Why do you think I am hostile? That is a product of projection; we perceive the world through the lens of the self, which distorts reality to fit the narrative we base our identity around.
I am “literally” marketing educational content, and if you can’t figure out how that works, just go digging through my profile, I recommend the dingleburger post at a minimum. But the fact remains; this is an issue that has enough weight within your value system to comment. I agree with you, to a degree, because there are exceptions to all rules, but the fact is you got confrontational when someone puts up an innocent comment you misinterpreted because your “self” perceived the tone as if you said it to yourself.
I didn’t presume you were hostile, just erratic. I seriously considered you were under some influence. I see now you just worded your reply poorly.
When someone says “I couldn’t care less”, and the immediate reply is proof or suggestion that they cared to some degree, this is usually taken as a challenge or denial to the fact that they couldn’t care less. Especially when it’s something easy to Not Do, such as commenting. This is because the phrase “I couldn’t care less” is more often than not used as an idiom, not in a literal sense. And in this particular occasion, you just so happened to point at how they could, in fact, care less: by not even commenting.
I’ll illustrate with a different example: A:“I couldn’t care less what my ex does with their life” B: “Yet you cared enough to check their social media yesterday” …so as you can see, B’s reply directly suggests A actually does care to some degree.
Therefore, without any context to show appreciation for the reply or without any visual or voice cues (this is text after all) to show the tone of your reply, it’s easy to presume you are trolling or not making any sense. The fact that you are coming up with this reply to someone who simply answered your question just adds another layer of confusion. Imagine asking someone to jump only to immediately say they shouldn’t be jumping. Just confusing.
And that’s also what the first commenter probably thought too, only they gracefully replied “non sequitur” as opposed to “dude what?” or “wtf?” which carry a similar sentiment and are just as applicable in this situation.
What?
So you were trolling all along. Well played
No, I’m playing an authentic, autobiographical character for educational purposes. I jist read all that and forgot what I was doing.
I’m not the other responder, but their assumption of hostility was most likely due to the glibness of your response. A single sentence, especially in text, leaves a great deal of room for misinterpretation. Almost no one is looking at your comments or posts by placing them in the context of your previous posts or comments. Most users will be looking at the title, some of the post text, and the text of some comments without ever even looking at the usernames. Thus, regardless of any reputation you feel you should have, they aren’t seeing it. Add on how the response is phrased similarly to a snarky reddit debater or a ‘gotcha,’ and it was almost guaranteed to be interpreted as hostile.
Now, imagine how you might have interpreted this comment if my entire response to you had been:
cuz ya glib
Yea, the machines can’t help themselves. And now more educational propaganda is created.
But I admire your capacity to deconstruct the subtext of the situation. This is where things get fun. I play an authentic, autobiographical character to market my educational (f)art project. This involves playing the fool. This involves baiting. This involves letting people decide their own Karma with the awareness that I’m always talking to an audience.
Y’all are playing the game of winning a conversation. I’m trying to get people in general to perceive n undo the karmic fetters that bind them to the existence-illusion complex. We are not the same.
Take your meds and get off the internet.
No u
non sequitur
Someone hasn’t had a kundalini awakening, yet!
“Ethical Incest” sonds like a wholesome and heartwarming porn cathegory
I’m not looking it up. I’m under investigation!
I’m reminded of a certain group of people who are obsessed with controlling what others do. I hate those people. So despite me thinking it’s gross, I’m not going to be a Muslim or a Christian about it.
What about a Jew? Buddhist? Flesh alchemist?
Probably Buddhist, but tell me more about that third option…
It’s my Illuminati-sponsored sect of occult science that has tremendatorious edumacational potentiality! But it involves unbinding from fetters and topology and I had a Kundalini awakening in my studies on DXM and I joined a cult and escaped to become a woman then spiraled into homelessness and learned all sorts of sorcery and magick, which are two different things! Read stuff on my profile that I just started to learn more!
deleted by creator
Thats quite disingenuous. I dont support incest but comparing it to mass murder isnt the right way to go about it
My life partner experiences genocide, personally, everyday he says. I thought he was talking about my frequent and nonstop masturbation, but if someone has genocide feitsh, I say let them do it safely with a consenting adult or genoplex or two.
