After five years as open source champions, Cal.com is going closed source. This wasn’t an easy decision, but in the age of AI-driven security threats, protecting customer data has to come first. Cal.diy will continue as an open option for hobbyists.

  • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    If AI scanning code for vulns is the problem, why don’t the developers have AI scan their code for vulns before release?

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      They do give a clue as to a reason/excuse why not in the article:

      Each [AI security] platform surfaces different vulnerabilities, making it difficult to establish a single, reliable source of truth for what is actually secure.

      Also, they come up with so many false positives that it’s a huge job to check over the reports for something usable.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s literally just pen testing, though. You search through tons of holes just to find the tunnel you were going down was blocked and not an issue.

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I asked this at my company wide security training session. The answer I received was that 0 days are hard to detect which is what makes them dangerous. Well duh, you just told me criminals were using currently available open source AI tools to find them. A total non answer was provided.

      So I just used the company mandated AI to scan or source code for vulnerabilities and patched the 2 it found.