• Klear@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I discussed with an AI what else could be done about this, but it didn’t offer any useful advice.

    Could have skipped this part.

    • techt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it serves a purpose even without the following sentence which accentuates that purpose:

      I opened a thread on GitHub, and three people replied with the same AI slop that was of no use at all.

      • Klear@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        IMO it weakens his next sentence. Idiots asking AI first and then posting that as an answer is a known (and completely separate) point, but he previously basically admits he’s well on his way to become of those idiots. At least he did understand that the AI told him utter bullshit.

        • orchid@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I really like how you’re discussing whether it makes sense to insert certain sentences into the text) I get the impression that you’re suggesting I shouldn’t ask the AI any questions at all. Even if I’m just using it as a replacement for Google, I should stop doing that. Or am I mistaken, and did you mean something else? Or can I keep using AI, but not tell anyone about it?

          • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            AI is incredibly useful but also model dependent. I suspect the biggest AI haters online are either completely irrational and/or politically motivated to hate it because it might take jobs etc., or they have used free/cheap models that are in fact pretty terrible because they have fewer parameters.