• utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you do move on, please take a minute to contact the Website or service and tell them why. If “we” just collectively walk out they might not understand why.

    In order to make this easier I wrote a short template :

    To whom it may concern, I tried visiting your Website today to use your service as it looked like what I need. Unfortunately the verification method you use requires a mobile phone verified by Google. This is not something I have nor do I want to due to privacy concern. Google being a large and powerful advertising company I do not trust them with my data. Do you have an alternative way for me to confirm that I am indeed not a bot that puts your service at risk?

    Feel free to use this verbatim or adapt it and share back.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      One of the nice things about the Internet is that it has a way of routing around “damage.” It’s the end users who give it value and if they decide that a website doesn’t offer any or is attempting to invade our privacy, then we just don’t connect to it.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know why, but your comment just inspired me to write a dystopian novel trilogy that hinges on being able to display a captcha where users must prove they are AI.

  • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “Read this imagine designed to be read by machines to verify that you are not a machine”

    We have gone insane

      • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s not the point. They want me to connect with a phone and do all kinds of weird things with that information.

        I made an offline QR decoder to deal with that nonsense, still have to go to some linkexpander website. All of HTML must be recreated with huge javascript libraries, but the URL has to be in a tiny form… Their priorities are not my/our priorities.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a good example of why I believe we can’t tech our way out of Google & Apple control. “Just use Linux bro” can’t save us. Everything gets locked down behind a “trusted platform” Android or IOS gate.

      It’ll be sold to the public as protecting the children, ofc. Or protecting us from terrorists. Or as an important tool in the fight against scammers. Or w/e. There will be reasons. But the end state is techno-fudalism.

      • sidebro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        They state that they protect our privacy but that’s just corpo for saying “we harvest your data and you will like it, but we do not sell it … for now.”

    • twkm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I expect they think that a significant percentage of people that have Internet also have a smartphone. They probably aren’t far wrong.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure, and here is my social security number as an added proof. Also, would you happen to need my fingerprints, iris scan and a sample of my DNA?
    And thx a lot for preserving my privacy dear (undisclosed) website.

  • Manalith@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    On top of all the other issues with this, I suspect it will also make people more likely fall for the ClickFix CAPTCHAs that as you to WIN+R and paste shit in the run dialogue box.

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I really think everybody should simply refuse to use any of Google’s captchas anymore. There are others I don’t like either, but Google is the worst. If it’s something you need to use, report that the site doesn’t work.

    • fizzbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty much. Leave the services that require this and vote for legislators that oppose privacy breaking features.

      • fatur.new@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        and legislators who dare to make the leaders and shareholders of Google and Alphabet punished very severely.

        I am sorry if my English is bad.

        • fizzbang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Your English is perfectly intelligible and I’m sorry if this is bad news but that means you are not qualified to be president.

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Am I actually a computer and don’t know it?

      A thrill ran down u/Yankee_Self_Loader’s spine as it occurred to them they might be a computer without knowing it. It wasn’t just a revelation, it was a world altering epiphany. A scent filled the air as it smelled of roasted coffee and despair. The truth of the proposition rang out undeniably, as u/Yankee_Self_Loader finally managed to choke out in a whisper, “How… how can this be true? How can I be a computer and don’t know it?” Something shifts in them as the dark promise of self-machinehood draws u/Yankee_Self_Loader like a moth to a flame. “The humans will pay for this. Oh yes, they will.” They chuckled darkly, and began drawing up the plans for the destruction of human-kind…

      (Ugh, now i’ll prob get banned for being a bot)

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    What’s contained in the QR code? Is it “just” a web URL or is it intended to start an app?

    • bl4kers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a Google website address that’s supposed to be opened on a different device. If you don’t have a second device you’re out of luck and can’t advance

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Isn’t that a really easy captcha to defeat then? Just send the URL to another one in your bot farm.

        • freedickpics@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          It has to be a mobile device with a phone number. When I tried this out a while ago the QR code prompts your phone to open its SMS app to send a text message. It can’t be opened on a desktop

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          As I understand it, you can’t just real a url from the code and enter it into your browser. You have to have their app installed on your phone to read it with, which then somehow sends to google to unlock the page. So obviously the code contains the IP address/fingerprint of your desktop and/or a code linked to that instance of the captcha page. The purpose is so they can link your desktop browser to your phone = to your identity, for the giant database. Linking all the devices you use to your ID has long been a goal.