• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    I hear what you’re saying, that at a certain level of wealth the power hierarchy becomes about seniority, and I don’t know that it’s wrong, but I’m not sure what reason there is to believe it either. Certainly people like elon musk are not all powerful, but what does that really say about the state of things when it would be hard to point to anyone who gets everything they want on a level beyond that?

    • taj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s more to wealth than pure money. Musk has the money. What he doesn’t have is the generations of wealth, that came before. Some of that can’t be bought.

    • Z745812939054@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      i don’t get what your argument is. that we don’t objectively know who the people above elon musk are, so therefore they must not exist?

      what DOES that say about the state of things? you tell me

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not a lot, as far as I can tell? I’m more expressing doubt than making an argument. You are claiming you know they do exist and what defines them, but I don’t see reasons to be confident about that.

        • Z745812939054@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          but I don’t see reasons to be confident about that.

          you have to adopt the mindset that makes the most sense to you, of course