when@lemmy.world to

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 days ago

[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?

108

[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?

when@lemmy.world to

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 days ago

Be civil and follow principle of charity in the comments.

Chat

plutopos@lemmy.zip
link
fedilink
arrow-up
3·
1 day ago
Exactly! The law doesn’t protect animals from sexual abuse, it only cares that humans aren’t directly having sex with them

Asklemmy@lemmy.ml

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

_Icon _by _{@[email protected]}

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

455 users / day
1.98K users / week
4.21K users / month
7.2K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
54.6K subscribers
651 Posts
10.4K Comments
Modlog