There’s a lunch spot at the top of the T but I have to cross the stem of the T to reach the top of the T.

Why are they doubling my chances to get hit when they could just add another crosswalk and let me cross one street instead of two? Are they stupid?

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The lights here do that as well. It’s an argument I still have with my teens: you should still use the crosswalks as the most visible place to cross, and walk directly across on the shortest path.

    But they recognize all lights are red. If they walk diagonally, they cross both streets at the same time but if they stay in the walk there may not be time

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup, a diagonal crosswalk is part of a “pedestrian scramble”. Someone posted the wiki article elsewhere in this post.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure but you can’t be the only ones doing it. It’s safer to be predictable and visible, follow whatever the local conventions/regulations/laws are

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The scramble is a formal design convention, requiring lights, signage and markings, it’s not a YOLO pedestrian manuever.