Sarah Valentine (she/her)

Okay, but they’re the ones staking their lives on Pizza Hut’s brand for their franchise instead of just making actually decent pizza under their own name and making an honest buck. I couldn’t care less about them seeing the consequences of their own selfish, greedy decisions.

They made a big deal when California minimum wage went up that they were going to fire every driver and use DoorDash.

Two people making the same mistake doesn’t make either of them more correct for the company.

Off with you too, boomer.

A chromebook is an open invitation for all manner of distraction.

Reactionaries blaming technology for social issues IS the distraction, boomer. You fell for it again and I’m not going to take you any more seriously just because you mashed out a wall of text about it.

A chromebook is literally just a slightly more capable tablet with a slightly more capable OS. You’re blaming technology for a social problem.

Correct. If you “mildly disagree” that using the mass-plagiarism-powered so-called “AI” is plagiarism from the getgo, you’re being an idiot and advancing the techbro oligarch agenda. I will not respect it. I will not have an overtly polite conversation about it. They are fucking destroying the environment and our living spaces with this shit. Stop using it. Stop defending it. If you disagree, I don’t want to hear from you. There’s nothing to discuss.

I’m not calling them anything. That’s just how the techbros view anyone who uses and defends their slopmachine scam.

Okay boomer.

That’s okay, you can disagree if you like. It’s not like you’re responsible for the creation, upkeep, and various abuses resulting from, this modern pseudo-AI stupidity. You’re just a useful idiot to them.

If that is truly the case, then it wouldn’t matter what anyone else thinks is or isn’t slop.

That sounds like plagiarism with extra steps, and it all starts here:

i then take random images from the internet

An interesting take, but not one that can be leaned on to navigate daily life as it doesn’t reflect an understanding of how most people wield the label of “liar”.

I wouldn’t consider it in a vacuum. I also look at intent and consequences. Did they omit info to gain advantage over others, or were they refusing to tell a Nazi where they hid the jews? Did their choice lead to a better outcome for everyone, or did it cause chaos and disrupt lives needlessly?

Everyone going “duh it’s still a lie” - calling someone a liar carries a specific connotation which I don’t think applies in all cases of so-called “lies”. To me, a lie carries with it not just an intentional falsehood but an accusation or an accusable misdeed. I wouldn’t call someone a liar because they hid jews from nazis.

Yes, absolutely.

…Oh, you meant a human population. Nevermind.

If one lacks compassion, then of course they won’t understand how someone can choose to support their community even without the government making them do it.

It looks like debian with KDE would be worth looking at. How do I obtain this?

Edit: Oh it’s free, I just googled it and it came up.

Which one is “literally just legally distinct windows 10”?